A recent paper from the European Central Bank (ECB) has faced significant criticism from a group of Bitcoin academics. The ECB paper, which suggested Bitcoin's price should be regulated or banned, claimed to highlight Bitcoin's volatility, lack of productive contribution, and wealth concentration as serious flaws. Dr. Murry Rudd from the Satoshi Action Fund argues that the ECB misinterpreted Bitcoin's purpose and misunderstood its technological foundations, particularly concerning decentralization. The rebuttal asserts that the paper incorrectly claims that Bitcoin's function has shifted from payments to investments and neglects its improvements in scalability. Additionally, Rudd emphasizes that large wallets often belong to exchanges, not individual wealth holders, challenging the ECB’s perspective on wealth concentration. The report also overlooks Bitcoin's potential benefits, like promoting financial inclusion and its utility in unstable currencies. The authors of the ECB report have ties to central bank digital currency (CBDC) projects, raising concerns about a possible conflict of interest that would bias their analysis against Bitcoin. The rebuttal ultimately critiques the ECB paper as lacking methodological rigor and presenting biased conclusions about Bitcoin's viability and utility.

Source 🔗